rdlc code 39

rdlc code 39

rdlc code 39

rdlc code 39

rdlc code 39

rdlc code 39,

rdlc code 39,

rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,

rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,

rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,
rdlc code 39,

4 Are there potential integration points for data exchange between these systems and existing systems such as Timberline and Prolog How open are the systems to be evaluated toward integration with other systems and tools 5 Is model-based estimating applicable to Turner s existing processes If not, specifically why not 6 Do the systems to be evaluated support the estimating process as the design evolves from a schematic sketch to construction documents How do model-based technologies support the design process, and do these technologies have the potential to impact or alter Turner s role 7 Is model-based estimating more cost-effective than the traditional estimating process 8 What other benefits are created in the preconstruction phase or downstream in the project life cycle from performing model-based estimating; and how do these benefits impact the conclusions to question 7 9 What are the coordination and interaction points with our subcontractors 10 What changes would be required to our preconstruction methodology regarding roles, staffing, and process to achieve the maximum potential benefits of these systems Are there viable alternatives to consider that achieve less benefit but incur less change to our existing processes and organization 11 What are the inherent major risks of these systems that should be considered 12 What are the hardware and software requirements for deploying these systems 13 What is the potential impact that model-based preconstruction may have on Turner In the fall of 2006 one Graphisoft license was purchased, including Estimator and Control My initial goal was to prove that using 3D modeling to capture quantities could be accomplished in relatively the same amount of time as using current takeoff systems To that end, the first step was to learn to model in ArchiCAD (Graphisoft s modeling engine) The pilot presented a challenge that consumed many nights and weekends, since I still had projects to complete and deadlines to meet A fair amount of self-motivation was required to push through this challenging period I began by modeling a medical office building that I was estimating at the time since I had the drawing s and permission to use them Progress was slow due to the limited time available Project: Medical Office Building This was a $90 million core and shell medical office building, 710,000 ft2 and 15 stories Structure: parking post tensioned concrete, podium CIP concrete, tower structural steel with concrete decks See Fig 531 One morning in early November, I showed one of our project executives the progress I was making with 3D modeling tools He showed immediate enthusiasm and wondered if the 3D tools could be used to help solve some design detailing problems he was having on one of his projects Even though this problem had nothing to do with estimating, it was a common field problem that could be solved using 3D technology Based on that encounter, I was immediately given a new high-speed computer, a job number to charge time against, and direction to model the project during regular work hours This sudden.

eye on them Sometimes developers miss deadlines, which screws up the publisher s shipping schedule and causes them to break promises to the retailers, who are expecting to get the game by a given date In extreme cases, the developer may go out of business, leaving the publisher with a half-finished game and no way to complete it The publisher says, We ve got to get some control back here keep this process where we can see it on a day-to-day basis Let s bring all our development in-house So the publisher goes out and hires a lot of programmers and writers and artists and musicians, and everything goes along well for a while until somebody notes that there is a huge number of people on staff, all drawing pay and consuming office space and taking vacations and requiring benefits and wanting stock options and bonuses It s costing the company a fortune So this person says to the management, You know, there are people out there who would work for half this much money if we pay them on contract We wouldn t have to provide all these nice benefits; we can give them just barely enough to stay alive with a promise of royalties when the game turns a profit They ll work their guts out for the prospect of getting rich, and we won t have all this overhead Management likes the idea, they duly get rid of all their in-house developers, and the cycle starts all over again This cycle typically takes about two to five years to run, and it depends on how good the management s corporate memory is If someone suggests it too soon, there will be someone else around who says, Oh, no, we had that system [whichever system] a year ago and it was a nightmare But if there s turnover in the senior staff, then the new ones don t know that it was a nightmare, and they go round again.

There is no visual indication of the change. Rebuild the application and check out the bin directory. The MyPhotos.exe program file is now displayed with the assigned icon.

This chapter jumped around the Windows Forms namespace to cover various topics related to application development. We began by talking about keyboard and mouse events, and made use of these events in our MyPhotos application. Keyboard event handlers receive a KeyPressEventArgs parameter for KeyPress events, and a KeyEventArgs parameter for KeyDown and KeyUp events. All mouse event handlers receive a MouseEventArgs parameter. We also discussed the creation of image buttons. We saw how to create custom bitmaps using our precision drawing skills in Visual Studio, and placed these bitmaps on a button in the PhotoEditDlg form in the MyPhotoAlbum project. Our final topic was the use of icons for the control box of a Form window, and the windows icon associated with an application. We discussed how to customize the icon for a form as well as an application. Along the way we discussed cursors, including the Cursors class supported by Windows Forms. We briefly touched on resource files, and looked at some examples of .resx files and how Visual Studio accesses items within these files using members of the System.Resources namespace. The final chapter in part 2 of the book will look at the ToolBar control and the use of tool tips.